Thursday, April 16, 2020
The Idea Of Women In Combat Is Not Unusual Anymore. Essays
  The idea of women in combat is not unusual anymore.    They should be able to hold combat positions beacause  although physical strength matters, the military still  needs the intelligence that women can bring. Also,  banning women from the combat hurts their military careers.    Although women account for only ten percent of the  enlisted personnel (Time, 8/21/95/ Pg. 31), they  are still a major part in the armed forces. Their  performance recently has generated support from Congress and  the public for enhancing the role of females in the military.    During the Persian Gulf War, women were sent to the    Middle East to fly helicopters, service combat jets,  refuel tankers, and load laser-guided bombs. Their  performance has led the world to realize that women  are extremely useful in combat. Defense secretary Dick    Chaney said "Women have made a major contribution to  this [war] effort. We could not have won without them."    Leaders in the field agreed. The Gulf War had the largest  deployment of women in the armed forces in history. These  women encountered the same risks as the men they served with.    Twenty one females lost their lives (Holm, Women in    Combat: The New Reality, pg. 67-68).    In the Persian Gulf, there were no exact  positions and all areas were equally vulnerable,  so the idea of safe havens for women was not really  applicable. By many armed forces policies,  females are banned from combat jobs and units,  but in the Persian Gulf War females were assigned  to battleships, aircraft carriers, and marine  support groups dug into the desert. From  their experience in the Persian Gulf, military women  have earned the right to be treated as equals with  men and not as protected individuals.    In spite of their record as able combat personnel, there  are laws and policies that restrict women in the United    States Military from serving in positions that require  them to engage in direct combat. Women in the Air    Force and Navy are barred from aircraft and vessels that  have a chance to be exposed to combat. The official,  established policies of the Army and Marine Corps exclude  women from combat (Snyder, pg. 75-76). These policies  prohibit women, on the basis of gender only, from over twelve  percent of the skill positions and thirty-nine  percent of the total positions offered by the    Department of Defense. Such policies excluding women  from combat need to be repealed by Congress. The    Fourteenth Amendment's "Equal Protection Clause" insures  every citizen "the equal protection of the laws." Although the  clause is not applicable to Federal government, the Supreme Court  said the Due Process Clause in the Fifth Amendment prohibits  the federal government from making unreasonable classifications.    Therefore the set laws and policies that exclude women from  combat not only violate the Fifth Amendment, but also deny  women their fundamental right to engage and excel in their  chosen occupation.    There have been many court cases involving  women in combat over the years, although  there has never been a case directly  challenging the constitutionality laws and  regulations banning women from combat. In  the case of Frontiero vs. Richardson, the court  rejected the idea that "man is, or should be,  woman's protector or defender," which in  actuality, put women not on a pedestal, but in  a cage. In Satty vs. Nashville Gas Co., the  decision stated that gender does not determine  who is able to perform capably as a soldier.    In the case of Schlesinger vs. Ballard, it was  realized by the Supreme Court that the  combat exclusion hinders the abilities  of women to gain the experience needed for  promotion within the military. The combat  exclusion puts women wishing to obtain  qualification for high-level positions at a  disadvantage, because leadership training is  usually acquired in combat-type positions.    Although many females are not eager to go into  combat, there are women who can and want to do  the job. In a time where technology takes  over battle lines and brains might be more  important than brawn, a reason to exclude women  is non-existant.    By: Megan Craven,    Jennifer Kopper,    Stacey Rohrer    Sources:    Time Magazine, Aug 21, 1991 p.31.    Holm, Jeanne, Women in Combat: The New Reality, pg. 67-68.    Snyder, Kathy L. "An Equal Right to Fight."    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.